|
|
|
 |
Posted: 24 May 2012, 12:32 |
|
|
Posts: 5Joined: 21 Jun 2010, 21:00
|
Hi, since the last update (yesterday), all the altitude graphs of all my tracks (except the one I uploaded one hour ago), are completely wrong! What's happened? Examples: Wrong: http://it.wikiloc.com/wikiloc/view.do?id=2804883Wrong: http://it.wikiloc.com/wikiloc/view.do?id=2804883Ok: http://it.wikiloc.com/wikiloc/view.do?id=2874910The graphs are wrong only when on the Wikiloc website in the new track details page! Instead, when I embed them on my website througt the "http://it.wikiloc.com/wikiloc/spatialArtifacts.do?....." call, they are all ok!! Strange! Until the last website update, they were the same! Can you help solve this? Other question: - In the "track detail" page, the title is no more linking my website page related to the track, as until the last update. Why? Thank you!
|
|
|
Posted: 24 May 2012, 13:01 |
|
|
Posts: 1136Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 18:28
|
Hi, since the last update all the elevation graphs have been rebuild. The two trails you say that have wrong elevation are the same trail.
Why are you sure that the elevations are wrong? Can you provide more information to know that I have to look for? Thanks.
P.D.: Maybe you looked the elevations profile while the rebuild process was in progress and haven't finished, is it possible?
|
|
|
Posted: 24 May 2012, 14:10 |
|
|
Posts: 5Joined: 21 Jun 2010, 21:00
|
I'm sorry....wrong links!:) Examples: Wrong: http://it.wikiloc.com/wikiloc/view.do?id=2804883Wrong: http://it.wikiloc.com/wikiloc/view.do?id=2775033Ok: http://it.wikiloc.com/wikiloc/view.do?id=2874910If you see the altitude graphs in the Google Maps from the tracks details page you can see that both starts from "zero" in the y axis and terminate much higher! The second track altitude starts and stops at the same altitude, but in the y axis the two point are different, but with the same altitude. The first track starts from 750mt and stops at 590mt....much lower than the start point, but in the graphs it "seems" terminating at the same y axis as the higher point! And also all other tracks all the same, except the one I uploaded this morning! In the "embed" view of the same tracks in my website with your "remote call", the altitude graphs are ok! What about the backlink to my website on the track page title of the second question? Sorry for my English! Thank you!
|
|
|
Posted: 24 May 2012, 15:06 |
|
|
Posts: 1136Joined: 19 Sep 2011, 18:28
|
OK, I understand the two problems now. Thanks for the explanations, we will look at it and see when we have something. I hope soon. Sorry for my english too, is probably worse.
P.D.: the backlink to your website must work now.
|
|
|
Posted: 28 May 2012, 15:07 |
|
|
Posts: 5Joined: 21 Jun 2010, 21:00
|
jeprubio wrote: P.D.: the backlink to your website must work now. Thank you! The backlinks are now ok! The altitude graphs problem persists, but I think you will have your time to address it! What can have went wrong in the past upgrade to have all graphs plotted wrong? Thank you!
|
|
|
Posted: 30 May 2012, 09:20 |
|
|
Posts: 300Joined: 24 Oct 2007, 21:18
|
Now all altitude graphs should show off properly. The issue was a mistake we did that affected the display only although the trail data (coordinates & elevation) was correct.
Regarding the external link to your website, we've moved to the more logical and easy to spot placement after the description. People were reporting that the subtle color change of the trail title was difficult to perceive (probably because most trails are not linked, so visitors get used that there's no link hidden on the titles) and some authors even had to mention "Click on the title for more info" on the description. Now for everyone interested in the trail info they'll see the link more easily.
|
|
|
Posted: 30 May 2012, 14:59 |
|
|
Posts: 5Joined: 21 Jun 2010, 21:00
|
Jordi wrote: Now all altitude graphs should show off properly. The issue was a mistake we did that affected the display only although the trail data (coordinates & elevation) was correct. Thank you, it's working ok, now! Jordi wrote: Regarding the external link to your website, we've moved to the more logical and easy to spot placement after the description. People were reporting that the subtle color change of the trail title was difficult to perceive (probably because most trails are not linked, so visitors get used that there's no link hidden on the titles) and some authors even had to mention "Click on the title for more info" on the description. Now for everyone interested in the trail info they'll see the link more easily. Sorry, but I don't see it at all! Where is that description box? And the link where it is in the page? Thanks a lot!!
|
|
|
Posted: 30 May 2012, 16:44 |
|
|
Posts: 300Joined: 24 Oct 2007, 21:18
|
The link appears only if you write a description to your trails since it is intended to add value (e.g: link to your blog post with pictures and a long description) what you already explain in wikiloc. We'll see though if we can show the link alone although it's definitely better for visitors to read at least a few words about the trail.
|
|
|
Posted: 30 May 2012, 17:34 |
|
|
Posts: 5Joined: 21 Jun 2010, 21:00
|
Jordi wrote: The link appears only if you write a description to your trails since it is intended to add value (e.g: link to your blog post with pictures and a long description) what you already explain in wikiloc. We'll see though if we can show the link alone although it's definitely better for visitors to read at least a few words about the trail. No problem at all! There is no problem for me to add descriptions. Until now I used to insert descriptions as "comments" whenever necessary. I will add descriptions to all the tracks in the next weeks, so no problem for the link alone! Thanks a lot!!
|